Estructuración de un marco referencial de métricas estándar de evaluación cualitativa de proyectos arquitectónicos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61347/ei.v5iEsp.1.302Palabras clave:
Calidad, criterios, cualificación, evaluación, indicadores, parámetrosResumen
El presente artículo tiene como objetivo establecer un marco referencial de métricas estándar para la evaluación cualitativa de obras y proyectos arquitectónicos, fundamentado en los parámetros de calidad disciplinar propuestos en investigaciones previas. La propuesta se centra en el desarrollo de una nueva escala de valor que permite determinar el nivel de cumplimiento de cada parámetro de calidad mediante criterios e indicadores de evaluación, cuya validez está respaldada por su aplicación en estudios previos de la comunidad científica. Para su elaboración, se empleó un enfoque de investigación mixto que integra revisión sistemática, metaanálisis y síntesis comparativa de la literatura especializada, permitiendo identificar convergencias significativas en los criterios e indicadores utilizados habitualmente en evaluaciones arquitectónicas. Los resultados evidencian patrones consistentes que determinan los niveles de calidad de las obras y proyectos, destacando la utilidad del marco propuesto como herramienta para consolidar evaluaciones más objetivas y sistemáticas. Este enfoque ofrece una base sólida para la estandarización de métricas de desempeño arquitectónico, facilitando comparaciones, mejoras metodológicas y la toma de decisiones fundamentadas en evidencia, contribuyendo así a la profesionalización y rigorización de los procesos de evaluación de la calidad arquitectónica en distintos contextos disciplinarios.
Descargas
Citas
Altomonte, S., Allen, J., Bluyssen, P., Brager, G., Heschong, L., Loder, A., Schiavon, S., Veitch, J., Wang, L., & Wargocki, P. (2020). Ten questions concerning well-being in the built environment. Building and Environment, 180, 106949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106949
Alves, D., Teixeira, R., Baptista, J., Briga-Sá, A., & Matos, C. (2025). Optimal rainwater harvesting system for a commercial building: A case study focusing on water and energy efficiency. Sustainability, 17(10), 4584. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104584
American Concrete Institute. (1995). Joints in concrete construction (ACI 224.3R 95). American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI. https://n9.cl/ot19my
American Concrete Institute. (2001). Control of cracking in concrete structures (ACI 224R 01). American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI. https://n9.cl/dn9iu
American Concrete Institute. (2011). Guide for design of slab-column connections in monolithic concrete structures (ACI 352.1R 11). American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI. https://n9.cl/lk9t5c
American Concrete Institute. (2016). Guide to durable concrete (ACI 201.2R 16). American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI. https://n9.cl/dq32t
American Concrete Institute. (2019). Requisitos del código de construcción para concreto estructural (ACI 318-19): Commentary on Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318R-19). American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI. https://n9.cl/v4u0i
American Institute of Steel Construction. (2022). Specification for structural steel buildings (ANSI/AISC 360 22). American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL. https://n9.cl/xbx97
ASTM International. (2023). Standard specification for concrete aggregates (ASTM C33/C33M 23). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://n9.cl/uktw4
Bhayo, B., Al-Kayiem, H., Gilani, S., & Ismail, F. (2020). Power management optimization of hybrid solar photovoltaic-battery integrated with pumped-hydro-storage system for standalone electricity generation. Energy Conversion and Management, 215, 112942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112942
Boz, T., Demirkan, H., & Urgen, B. (2024). Visual perception of the built environment in virtual reality: A systematic characterization of human aesthetic experience in spaces with curved boundaries. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 18(6), 1043–1058. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000504
Chen, P. (2025). Public spaces in Bologna: Mediating social interactions by intercultural placemaking. European Planning Studies, 33(7), 1077–1103. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2025.2480109
Coburn, A., Vartanian, O., Kenett, Y., Nadal, M., Hartung, F., Hayn-Leichsenring, G., Navarrete, G., González-Mora, J., & Chatterjee, A. (2020). Psychological and neural responses to architectural interiors. Cortex, 126, 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.01.009
CUSTOM® Building Products. (2021). CEJ-171 WM: Movement joints Waterproof Membrane (TCNA EJ171 / TTMAC 301MJ). CUSTOM® Building Products. Huntington Beach, CA. https://n9.cl/5gx39m
Del, M., Sedghpour, B., & Tabrizi, S. (2020). The semantic conservation of architectural heritage: The missing values. Heritage Science, 8, 70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-020-00416-w
Dianat, I., Molenbroek, J., & Castellucci, H. I. (2018). A review of the methodology and applications of anthropometry in ergonomics and product design. Ergonomics, 61(12), 1696–1720. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1502817
Djukanovic, M., Alegre, A., & Bastos, F. (2025). Prefabricated solutions for housing: Modular architecture and flexible living spaces. Buildings, 15(6), 862. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15060862
Ekhaese, E., & Oyelude, F. (2025). The impact of inclusive architectural strategies on social inclusion characteristics in innovation hubs in Southwest Nigeria. Frontiers in Built Environment, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2025.1632945
Farhat, B., & Alaeddine, H. (2023). Improving assessment criteria of universal design: Towards an equitable approach. MSA Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.21608/msaeng.2023.309316
Figueiredo, Y., Prim, M., & Dandolini, G. (2021). Urban regeneration in the light of social innovation: A systematic integrative literature review. Land Use Policy, 113, 105873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105873
Ginigaddara, T., Ekanayake, C., Gunawardena, T., & Mendis, P. (2023). Resilience and performance of prefabricated modular buildings against natural disasters. Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering, 23(4), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.56748/ejse.23542
Grasso-Cladera, A., Arenas-Perez, M., Wegertseder-Martinez, P., Vilina, E., Mattoli-Sanchez, J., & Parada, F. (2025). Neuroscientific insights into the built environment: A systematic review of empirical research on indoor environmental quality, physiological dynamics, and psychological well-being in real-life contexts. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(6), 824. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22060824
Gualano, R., Crocker, R., Smith, J., Maizes, V., Weil, A., & Sternberg, E. (2021). An integrative health framework for wellbeing in the built environment. Building and Environment, 205, 108253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108253
Guo, Y., Liu, Y., Lu, S., Chan, O. F., Chui, C. H. K., & Lum, T. Y. S. (2021). Objective and perceived built environment, sense of community, and mental wellbeing in older adults in Hong Kong: A multilevel structural equation study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 209, 104058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104058
Gupta, A., Yadav, M., & Nayak, B. (2025). A systematic literature review on inclusive public open spaces: Accessibility standards and universal design principles. Urban Science, 9(6), 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9060181
Hamdaoui, A., & Adad, M. (2024). Theoretical reflection on the concept of perceived quality from an architectural perspective. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 4(44), Article 3077. https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.4(44).2024.3077
Hasan, L., & Ikaputra, I. (2025). Tinjauan teoretis makna arsitektur melalui perspektif semiotika. Arsitektura, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/arst.v23i1.97622
Hedvall, P., Ståhl, A., & Iwarsson, S. (2025). Accessibility, usability and universal design – still confusing? Harmonisation of key concepts describing person-environment interaction to create conditions for participation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 47(25), 6750–6759. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2491831
Imrie, R. (2012). Universalism, universal design and equitable access to the built environment. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(10), 873–882. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.624250
International Organization for Standardization. (2007). Bases for design of structures - Serviceability of buildings and walkways against vibrations (ISO 10137:2007). ISO, Geneva, Switzerland. https://n9.cl/6lbsy
International Organization for Standardization. (2008). Plastics — Assessment of the effectiveness of fungistatic compounds in plastics formulations (ISO 16869:2008). ISO, Geneva, Switzerland. https://n9.cl/fzfqv
Iriarte, M., & Castillo, T. (2025). Estandarización holística de los parámetros configurativos que cualifican el proyecto arquitectónico. Esprint Investigación, 4(4), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.61347/ei.v4i4.178
Jaglarz, A. (2023). Perception of color in architecture and urban space. Buildings, 13(8), 2000. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13082000
Jamshidi, S., Ensafi, M., & Pati, D. (2020). Wayfinding in interior environments: An integrative review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 549628. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.549628
Jansen, B., van Stijn, A., Gruis, V., & van Bortel, G. (2020). A circular economy life cycle costing model (CE-LCC) for building components. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161, 104857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104857
Januszewski, W. (2024). Logic, perception, and beauty—An outline of the modern proportion-based approach in architecture. Buildings, 14(8), 2266. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082266
Jutzi, C., Möller, J., Hansen, J., Klackl, J., & Jonas, E. (2025). Psychological needs in the built environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 101, 102419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102419
Kahraman, M., Şekerci, Y., Bal, H., & Bakır, K. (2024). Human-centered approach for furniture design studio course in interior design education: A case study. Mobilya ve Ahşap Malzeme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(1), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.33725/mamad.1485323
Li, R. (2024). Architectural narratives of aesthetic form: Exploring the perception and psychological design in church architecture. Journal of Research in Science and Engineering, 6(10), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.53469/jrse.2024.06(10).07
Malewczyk, M., Taraszkiewicz, A., & Czyż, P. (2024). Visual perception of regularity and the composition pattern type of the facade. Buildings, 14(5), 1389. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14051389
Natapov, A., Kuliga, S., Dalton, R., & Hölscher, C. (2019). Linking building-circulation typology and wayfinding: Design, spatial analysis, and anticipated wayfinding difficulty of circulation types. Architectural Science Review, 63(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2019.1675041
Natapov, A., Kuligas, S., & Dalton, R. (2015). Building circulation typology and Space Syntax predictive measures. Conference paper, peer-reviewed. https://n9.cl/c2hax
O’Grady, T., Minunno, R., Chong, H., & Morrison, G. (2021). Design for disassembly, deconstruction and resilience: A circular economy index for the built environment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 175, 105847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105847
O’Grady, T., Minunno, R., Chong, H., & Morrison, G. (2021). Interconnections: An analysis of disassemblable building connection systems towards a circular economy. Buildings, 11(11), 535. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11110535
Ottenhaus, L., Yan, Z., Brandner, R., Leardini, P., Fink, G., & Jockwer, R. (2023). Design for adaptability, disassembly and reuse – A review of reversible timber connection systems. Construction and Building Materials, 400, 132823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132823
Patil, A., & Raghani, S. (2025). Designing accessible and independent living spaces for visually impaired individuals: A barrier-free approach to interior design. International Journal for Equity in Health, 24, 137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02503-5
Silviana, S., Hardianto, A., & Hermawan, D. (2022). The implementation of anthropometric measurement in designing the ergonomics work furniture. EUREKA: Physics and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2022.001967
Skempton, A. W., & MacDonald, D. H. (1956). The allowable settlements of buildings. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 5(6), 727–768. https://doi.org/10.1680/ipeds.1956.12202
Song, P., Wu, L., Zhao, W., Ma, W., & Hao, J. (2024). Life cycle sustainability assessment: An index system for building energy retrofit projects. Buildings, 14(9), 2817. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092817
Spence, C. (2020). Senses of place: Architectural design for the multisensory mind. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5, 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00243-4
St-Jean, P., Clark, O., & Jemtrud, M. (2022). A review of the effects of architectural stimuli on human psychology and physiology. Building and Environment, 219, 109182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109182
Villa, V., Naticchia, B., Bruno, G., Aliev, K., Piantanida, P., & Antonelli, D. (2021). IoT open-source architecture for the maintenance of building facilities. Applied Sciences, 11(12), 5374. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125374
Villaschi, F., Carvalho, J., & Bragança, L. (2022). BIM-based method for the verification of building code compliance. Applied System Innovation, 5(4), 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5040064
Waterloo, M., Arshad, R., La Loma González, B., & Soler, G. (2025). Rainwater harvesting potential from photovoltaic energy systems in the Sahel. Water-Energy Nexus, 8, 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wen.2025.04.002
Xie, L., & Bulkeley, H. (2020). Nature-based solutions for urban biodiversity governance. Environmental Science & Policy, 110, 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.002
Zali, P., McElroy, L., Giardini, M., Chaiyawat, K., & Watson, M. (2025). A scoping review of the impact of environmental design on wayfinding for people with sensory impairment. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867251391361
Zallio, M., & Clarkson, P. (2021). On inclusion, diversity, equity, and accessibility in civil engineering and architectural design: A review of assessment tools. Proceedings of the Design Society, 1, 2297–2306. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.491
Zallio, M., & Clarkson, P. (2021). Inclusion, diversity, equity and accessibility in the built environment: A study of architectural design practice. Building and Environment, 206, 108352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108352
Zallio, M., & Clarkson, P. J. (2022). The inclusion, diversity, equity and accessibility audit: A post-occupancy evaluation method to help design the buildings of tomorrow. Building and Environment, 217, 109058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109058
Zhong, W., Schröder, T., & Bekkering, J. (2022). Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(1), 114–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Marcél Rubén Iriarte Oporto, Tito Oswaldo Castillo Campoverde
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
