Estandarización holística de los parámetros configurativos que cualifican el proyecto arquitectónico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61347/ei.v4i4.178Palabras clave:
Belleza, firmeza, inclusión, resiliencia, sostenibilidad, utilidadResumen
El presente artículo tiene como objetivo establecer una estandarización holística de los parámetros configurativos de un buen proyecto arquitectónico, integrando la tríada clásica, firmitas, utilitas y venustas, establecida por Vitruvio, con la tríada contemporánea, inclusión, sostenibilidad y resiliencia, promovida por el Instituto Americano de Arquitectura (AIA). Para ello, se aplicó un método mixto que combina revisión sistemática, meta-análisis y síntesis comparativa de la literatura especializada. Los resultados evidenciaron convergencias y tensiones entre los ideales clásicos y las exigencias sociales, tecnológicas y ambientales del siglo XXI. A partir de estos hallazgos, se propuso un modelo integrador y flexible de estandarización de los parámetros configurativos, capaz de combinar de manera armónica belleza, funcionalidad y firmeza con equidad, resiliencia y desempeño ambiental.
Descargas
Citas
Auret, H. (2020). The responsibility of architecture: beauty, justice and the call of care. Acta Theologica, 152-175. https://doi.org/10.18820/23099089/actat.sup29.9
Campos, P. (2020). Resilience, education and architecture: The proactive and “educational” dimensions of the spaces of formation. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 43, 101391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101391
Carrasco, S., & Lopez, I. (2024). Linking education and practice gaps for inclusive architecture in the AEC industry. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 19(1), 128-148. https://doi.org/10.1108/arch-11-2023-0297
Coburn, A., Kardan, O., Kotabe, H., Steinberg, J., Hout, M., Robbins, A., MacDonald, J., Hayn-Leichsenring, G., & Berman, M. (2019). Psychological responses to natural patterns in architecture. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 62, 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVP.2019.02.007
Coburn, A., Vartanian, O., Kenett, Y., Nadal, M., Hartung, F., Hayn-Leichsenring, G., Navarrete, G., González-Mora, J., & Chatterjee, A. (2020). Psychological and neural responses to architectural interiors. Cortex, 126, 217-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.01.009
Dabija, A.-M. (2017). Sustainability – A principle of education in architecture (and not only). En I. Visa & A. Duta (Eds.), Nearly Zero Energy Communities (pp. 632 640). Springer Proceedings in Energy. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-63215-5_43
Delitz, H. (2018). Architectural Modes of Collective Existence: Architectural Sociology as a Comparative Social Theory. Cultural Sociology, 12(1), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975517718435
Di Bernardo, M. (2019). Percezione visiva, neuroestetica e sistemi autopoietici. Ágalma: rivista di studi culturali e di estetica, 38(2), 87‑96. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/4686228
Dobusch, L. (2021). The inclusivity of inclusion approaches: A relational perspective on inclusion and exclusion in organizations. Gender, Work and Organization, 28, 379-396. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12574
Doorn, N., Gardoni, P., & Murphy, C. (2018). A multidisciplinary definition and evaluation of resilience: the role of social justice in defining resilience. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 4(3), 112-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2018.1428162
Fedorczak-Cisak, M., Kowalska-Koczwara, A., Nering, K., Pachla, F., Radziszewska-Zielina, E., Śladowski, G., Tatara, T., & Ziarko, B. (2019). Evaluation of the Criteria for Selecting Proposed Variants of Utility Functions in the Adaptation of Historic Regional Architecture. Sustainability, 11(4), 1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041094
Figurny, G. (2021). Phenomenological Approaches in the Theory of Architecture in the Context of Modern Cognitive Science. Voprosy Filosofii, 6, 65-73. https://acortar.link/diSkeJ
Garg, A., & Chaurasia, S. (2025). Psychology of Architecture. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25apr2076
Genadt, A. (2019). Three Lessons from Japan on Architectural Resilience. Architectural Histories, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.5334/AH.393
Ghanbari, J. (2018). Psychological Role of Architecture in Social Integration of Immigrants in Multicultural Cities: Design Experience of a Residential Mixed-Function High-Rise. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 20, 577-592. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12134-018-0616-7
Ghom, P., & George, A. (2021). Dynamics of Performing Aesthetics in Architecture: A Critical Study. VITRUVIO - International Journal of Architectural Technology and Sustainability, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.4995/vitruvio-ijats.2021.16424
Gołębiowska, M. (2023). Beauty of Nature’s Forms in Classic Approach in Modern Architecture. ARCHITECTURAE ET ARTIBUS, 15, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.24427/aea-2023-vol15-06
Gucyeter, B. (2016). The Place of Sustainability in Architectural Education: Discussion and Suggestions. Athens Journal of Architecture, 2(3), 237-256. https://doi.org/10.30958/AJA.2-3-4
Guerrero, L., & Soria, F. (2018). Traditional architecture and sustainable conservation. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 8(2), 194-206. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-06-2017-0036
Heylighen, A., Linden, V., & Steenwinkel, I. (2017). Ten questions concerning inclusive design of the built environment. Building and Environment, 114, 507-517. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2016.12.008
Hubbard, P. (1996). CONFLICTING INTERPRETATIONS OF ARCHITECTURE: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(2), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.1006/JEVP.1996.0007
Iwuanyanwu, O., Gil-Ozoudeh, I., Chukwudi, A., & Somadina, C. (2024). Cultural and social dimensions of green architecture: Designing for sustainability and community well-being. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences 6(8). https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i8.1477
Januszewski, W. (2024). Logic, Perception, and Beauty—An Outline of the Modern Proportion-Based Approach in Architecture. Buildings, 14(8), 2266. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082266
Javier1949. (2009, March 13). Pabellón Alemán de Barcelona 09 12660 [Photograph]. Flickr. https://www.flickr.com/photos/javier1949/3351024735/
Kim, J. (2023). The Multi-Faceted Practice of Architectural Sustainability Found in the Regional Architecture of Vorarlberg, Austria. Sustainability, 15(3), 2430. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032430
Kristoffersen, A., Schultz, C., & Kamari, A. (2024). A critical comparison of concepts and approaches to social sustainability in the construction industry. Journal of Building Engineering, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109530
Laboy, M., & Fannon, D. (2016). Resilience theory and praxis: A critical framework for architecture. Enquiry The ARCC Journal for Architectural Research, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.17831/ENQ:ARCC.V13I2.405
Lami, I., & Mecca, B. (2021). Assessing Social Sustainability for Achieving Sustainable Architecture. Sustainability, 13(1), 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010142
LanBo0428. (2023, May 20). Jewel Changi Airport [Photograph]. Wikimedia Commons. https://acortar.link/R8s3YY
Lehene, I.-A. (2020). A Reconsideration on the Theory of Beauty: Selected Definitions, Concepts and Views on the Topic (Part I). Periodica Polytechnica Architecture, 51(2), 209-219. https://doi.org/10.3311/ppar.12605
Li, S., Liu, L., & Peng, C. (2020). A Review of Performance-Oriented Architectural Design and Optimization in the Context of Sustainability: Dividends and Challenges. Sustainability, 12(4), 1427. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041427
Lyu, F. (2019). Architecture as spatial storytelling: Mediating human knowledge of the world, humans and architecture. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 8(3), 275-283 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOAR.2019.05.002
Mako, V. (2017). The Aesthetics of Transformation. Athens Journal of Architecture, 3(3), 263-276. https://doi.org/10.30958/AJA.3-3-3
Martek, I., Hosseini, M., Shrestha, A., Zavadskas, E., & Seaton, S. (2018). The Sustainability Narrative in Contemporary Architecture: Falling Short of Building a Sustainable Future. Sustainability, 10(4), 981. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040981
Mayar, K., Carmichael, D., & Shen, X. (2022). Stability and Resilience—A Systematic Approach. Buildings, 12(8), 1242. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081242
Mayar, K., Carmichael, D., & Shen, X. (2023). Resilience and Systems—A Building Structure Case Example. Buildings, 13(6), 1520. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061520
Mouhcine, B. (2025). Architectural Resilience for Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainable Development, 33(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3379
Mukanda, K. (2010). Sustainable Architecture. The International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic, and Social Sustainability: Annual Review, 6(2), 209-228. https://acortar.link/xgLS9c
Murtagh, N., Roberts, A., & Hind, R. (2016). The relationship between motivations of architectural designers and environmentally sustainable construction design. Construction Management and Economics, 34(1), 61 - 75. https://acortar.link/DHjuFa
Nasrullah, N., & Syafri, S. (2024). Innovative sustainable design approaches in urban architecture: Balancing aesthetics and environmental impact. Global International Journal of Innovative Research, 2(9), 2007-2024. https://acortar.link/ECrJZ1
Nowakowski, P. (2024). Beauty and Utility in Architecture, Interior Design and in the New European Bauhaus Concepts. Buildings, 14(4), 870. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14040870
Pasenidou, F. (2024). The emerging intersection: the role of architecture in promoting inclusive education. Oxford Review of Education, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2024.2427041
Paulichen, L., Magalhães, R., & Goncalves, S. (2020). Resilience in architecture: housing as a process. Strategic Design Research Journal, 12, 383-401. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2019.123.06
Pei, L., & Cao, Z. (2025). Aesthetic Appreciation Is Different: Aesthetic Pleasure in Architectural Aesthetics. Buildings, 15(4), 543. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15040543
Peters, T. (2021). The Social Contexts of Resilient Architecture. Multisystemic Resilience, 625-645. https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190095888.003.0033
Ramírez, R. (2013, noviembre 19). Estadio Olímpico, Pekín [Fotografía]. Flickr. https://www.flickr.com/photos/7575472@N02/10948402984/
Ranjbaran, A., Ranjbaran, M., Ranjbaran, F., Rousta, A., & Hashemi, S. (2023). A new perspective for stability analysis of structures. NED University Journal of Research, 20(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.35453/nedjr-stmech-2021-0010.r3
Salama, A. (2019). Methodological research in architecture and allied disciplines: Philosophical positions, frames of reference, and spheres of inquiry. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 13(1), 8-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-01-2019-0012
Schumacher, P. (2024). Beauty - the indispensable category explained, justified and critically employed. Architectural Intelligence, 3(36). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44223-024-00078-9
Scordato, L., & Gulbrandsen, M. (2024). Resilience perspectives in sustainability transitions research: A systematic literature review. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2024.100887
Scott, I., McLachlan, F., & Brookfield, K. (2018). Inclusive design and pedagogy: An outline of three innovations. Built Environment, 44(1), 9-22. https://doi.org/10.2148/BENV.44.1.9
Seko Fotografía. (2015, December 21). Museo Guggenheim Bilbao, Bilbao [Fotografía]. Flickr. https://flickr.com/photos/91425440@N06/23811575351
St-Jean, P., Clark, O., & Jemtrud, M. (2022). A review of the effects of architectural stimuli on human psychology and physiology. Building and Environment, 219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109182
Szuba, B. (2019). Multi-criteria evaluation of beauty in architecture. SAJ - Serbian Architectural Journal, 11(3), 369-396. https://doi.org/10.5937/saj1903369s
Troy, A., Willroth, E., Shallcross, A., Giuliani, N., Gross, J., & Mauss, I. (2022). Psychological Resilience: An Affect-Regulation Framework. Annual Review of Psychology, 74, 547 - 576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020122-041854
Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A., Fich, L., Leder, H., Modroño, C., Nadal, M., Rostrup, N., & Skov, M. (2013). Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(2), 10446 - 10453. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301227110
Viaje al Corazón de Bolivia. (2012, January 22). Población Chipaya [Fotografía]. Flickr. https://www.flickr.com/photos/viajebolivia/6739432691/
Wilson, J. (1935). Stability of Structures. Nature, 136, 568-571. https://doi.org/10.1038/136568a0
Wpcpey. (2018, July 10). Robson Square waterfall 2018 [Photograph]. Wikimedia Commons. https://acortar.link/6ZjCId
Zallio, M., & Clarkson, P. (2021). Inclusion, diversity, equity and accessibility in the built environment: A study of architectural design practice. Building and Environment, 206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108352
Zallio, M., & Clarkson, P. (2023). A study to depict challenges and opportunities building industry professionals face when designing inclusive and accessible buildings. Architectural Science Review, 67(3), 268 - 279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2023.2270983
Ziaee, A. (2024). Spaces of Radical Possibility: Designing for and from Intersectionality. Trends in Higher Education, 3(4), 1109-1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu3040065
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Marcél Rubén Iriarte Oporto, Tito Oswaldo Castillo Campoverde
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
